PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


BUZZ

1D
-2.53%
1M
14.04%
YTD
22.01%
6M
16.69%
1Y
44.51%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
22.01%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-0.89%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and BNO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.07

The correlation between BUZZ and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUZZBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

5.17

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

9.76

-6.20

BUZZ vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUZZBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.23

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.69

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.14

+0.19

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-87.06%

+30.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-17.87%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-23.75%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

-33.70%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-10.29%

+7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-40.17%

+16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

9.45%

+3.10%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is 9.36%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that BUZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

14.22%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.67%

36.10%

-12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.35%

41.46%

-10.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

35.38%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

36.68%

-3.99%

BUZZ vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and BNO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to BUZZ (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 24.16% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, BUZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BUZZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 24.16% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

BUZZ and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer