BUYW vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BUYW (Main Buywrite ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Main Funds, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. BUYW is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUYW returned 8.72%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for QYLD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUYW charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

BUYW vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.25% return.

BUYW

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYW vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF	3.48%	9.08%	9.82%	12.80%	1.94%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.25%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYW and QYLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2022	0.58

The correlation between BUYW and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUYW vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUYW	QYLD
Technology	26.6%	58.7%
Communication Services	16.4%	14.3%
Financial Services	14.5%	0.2%
Healthcare	13.0%	3.7%
Energy	12.7%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	11.4%
Industrials	4.4%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	6.4%
Utilities	1.2%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.1%

Return for Risk

BUYW vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYW

BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 74
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 91

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYW vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUYW	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.29	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.21	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.51	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	4.46	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.26	24.33	-6.07

BUYW vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYW Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYW and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUYW vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYW	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.36%	-24.75%	+15.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	-4.97%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.36%	-19.06%	+9.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-1.77%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-3.82%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	0.91%	-0.42%

Volatility

BUYW vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) is 1.41%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that BUYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUYW	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	4.78%	-3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.90%	8.45%	-4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.84%	9.69%	-4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	14.84%	-6.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.43%	15.55%	-7.12%

BUYW vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUYW vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, less than QYLD's 11.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF	5.95%	5.89%	5.93%	5.95%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.64%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUYW and QYLD in my portfolio?

BUYW and QYLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUYW or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to BUYW (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYW dropped -9.36% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, BUYW or QYLD?

On 3-year performance, QYLD leads with 14.40% vs 8.72% for BUYW. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUYW or QYLD?

Over the 3-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUYW or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUYW or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.64%, compared with 5.95% for BUYW.

What is the main difference between BUYW and QYLD?

BUYW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.