PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYW vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


BUYW

1D
0.35%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.27%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
3.39%3.92%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYW and AMDW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.31

BUYW vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUYW
AMDW

Technology

24.0%
28.6%

Communication Services

16.9%

-

Financial Services

15.3%

-

Energy

13.6%

-

Healthcare

13.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Industrials

4.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

BUYW
24.0%
AMDW
28.6%

Communication Services

BUYW
16.9%
AMDW

-

Financial Services

BUYW
15.3%
AMDW

-

Energy

BUYW
13.6%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

BUYW
13.0%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

BUYW
6.4%
AMDW

-

Industrials

BUYW
4.4%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

BUYW
3.2%
AMDW

-

Utilities

BUYW
1.3%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

BUYW
1.0%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

BUYW
1.0%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYW vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUYWAMDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.24

BUYW vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUYWAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

4.83

-3.66

Drawdowns

BUYW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYWAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-34.64%

+25.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-14.66%

+14.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

Volatility

BUYW vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYWAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

81.56%

-76.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

81.56%

-73.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

81.56%

-73.09%

BUYW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.91%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYW and AMDW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 5.91% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYW and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer