PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUSIX vs. FHCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BUSIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FHCOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUSIX
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund
0.83%4.93%5.87%5.09%0.32%0.32%
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
1.54%4.94%5.34%4.80%0.76%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BUSIX and FHCOX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUSIX vs. FHCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSIX

FHCOX
FHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUSIXFHCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.36

Drawdowns

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUSIXFHCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

Volatility

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUSIXFHCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.40%

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSIX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCOX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BUSIX vs. FHCOX - Dividend Comparison

BUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FHCOX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUSIX
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund
3.19%4.29%4.65%3.48%1.87%1.24%1.72%2.60%2.05%1.57%1.74%1.36%
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
4.38%4.61%4.99%4.17%1.26%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUSIX and FHCOX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUSIX and FHCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer