PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCOX vs. USIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
0.49%4.94%5.34%4.80%0.76%0.14%
USIAX
UBS Ultra Short Income Fund
0.13%4.54%5.35%4.47%-0.38%-0.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCOX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than USIAX's 0.13% return.


FHCOX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.61%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*

USIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
0.13%
6M
1.10%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FHCOX vs. USIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USIAX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FHCOX vs. USIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCOX
FHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

USIAX
USIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
USIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
USIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCOXUSIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

2.37

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.22

4.85

+6.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.11

2.99

+1.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.72

4.78

+8.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

53.04

45.29

+7.75

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the USIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCOX and USIAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCOXUSIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

2.37

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.31

0.50

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

0.46

+1.84

Correlation

The correlation between FHCOX and USIAX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Dividend Comparison

FHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than USIAX's 3.63% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
4.12%4.61%4.99%4.17%1.26%0.24%0.00%0.00%
USIAX
UBS Ultra Short Income Fund
3.63%4.43%5.10%3.74%1.44%0.12%0.93%1.07%

Drawdowns

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCOX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum USIAX drawdown of -4.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCOX and USIAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCOXUSIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-4.88%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-0.81%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.59%

-4.88%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.20%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-0.22%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.09%

-0.01%

Volatility

FHCOX vs. USIAX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX) at 0.14%. This indicates that FHCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FHCOXUSIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.14%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

0.86%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37%

1.65%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.41%

5.63%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.40%

4.50%

-3.10%