FHCOX vs. FULBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHCOX (Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund) and FULBX (Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds from Federated. Over the past 5 years, FHCOX returned 3.44%/yr vs 3.12%/yr for FULBX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FHCOX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FULBX.

Performance

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCOX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than FULBX's 1.29% return.

FHCOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 4.94%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —

FULBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund	1.43%	4.94%	5.34%	4.80%	0.76%	0.14%
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.29%	5.50%	5.35%	5.15%	-1.31%	-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCOX and FULBX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021	0.40

Over the past year, FHCOX and FULBX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FHCOX vs. FULBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCOX

FHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FULBX

FULBX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FULBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FULBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FULBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHCOX	FULBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	2.97	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.14	7.99	+3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.87	2.48	+1.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.70	8.82	+5.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	74.06	40.67	+33.39

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the FULBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCOX and FULBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCOX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum FULBX drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCOX and FULBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHCOX	FULBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-5.43%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-0.54%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.50%	-0.54%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.59%	-2.60%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.80%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.06%	0.12%	-0.06%

Volatility

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) is 0.44%, while Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that FHCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FULBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHCOX	FULBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.47%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.93%	1.17%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36%	1.59%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.44%	1.38%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.40%	1.26%	+0.14%

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FULBX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHCOX vs. FULBX - Dividend Comparison

FHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than FULBX's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund	4.39%	4.61%	4.99%	4.17%	1.26%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.60%	4.79%	3.99%	2.67%	1.00%	0.56%	1.49%	2.16%	1.90%	1.25%	0.84%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHCOX and FULBX in my portfolio?

FHCOX and FULBX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHCOX or FULBX?

FULBX has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to FHCOX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCOX dropped -0.59% vs FULBX's -5.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.