PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUSA vs. MDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUSA vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUSA achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than MDLV's 10.95% return.


BUSA

1D
1.39%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.42%
6M
10.80%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDLV

1D
0.67%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.88%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSA vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
8.42%17.56%15.76%10.65%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.95%13.30%10.16%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BUSA and MDLV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023

0.79

The correlation between BUSA and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUSA vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUSA
MDLV

Healthcare

23.8%
7.9%

Financial Services

20.1%
14.9%

Technology

12.9%
9.3%

Industrials

12.4%
15.0%

Energy

7.3%
14.4%

Communication Services

5.6%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.6%

Utilities

3.4%
15.2%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Healthcare

BUSA
23.8%
MDLV
7.9%

Financial Services

BUSA
20.1%
MDLV
14.9%

Technology

BUSA
12.9%
MDLV
9.3%

Industrials

BUSA
12.4%
MDLV
15.0%

Energy

BUSA
7.3%
MDLV
14.4%

Communication Services

BUSA
5.6%
MDLV
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

BUSA
5.1%
MDLV
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BUSA
4.9%
MDLV
3.9%

Basic Materials

BUSA
4.1%
MDLV
2.6%

Utilities

BUSA
3.4%
MDLV
15.2%

Real Estate

BUSA

-

MDLV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUSA vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSA
BUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSA vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUSAMDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

5.01

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

15.75

-4.80

BUSA vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUSA and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUSAMDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.44

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.08

+0.41

Drawdowns

BUSA vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSA and MDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUSAMDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-10.71%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-4.27%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-2.29%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.36%

+0.87%

Volatility

BUSA vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUSAMDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

6.58%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

8.77%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

10.51%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

10.51%

+3.15%

BUSA vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUSA vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

BUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than MDLV's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
1.46%1.53%1.37%0.22%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.00%2.78%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUSA and MDLV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLV has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to BUSA (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUSA dropped -14.19% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

On 1-year performance, BUSA leads with 24.37% vs 21.29% for MDLV. On fees, MDLV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUSA has performed better with a 24.37% return vs 21.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDLV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUSA.

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.46% for BUSA.

They also come from different issuers: Brandes and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUSA and 0.58% for MDLV.

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUSA and MDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer