BUSA vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUSA (Brandes U.S. Value ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BUSA returned 20.49% vs 27.24% for CGDV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUSA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

BUSA vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUSA achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.07% return.

BUSA

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 20.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 10.39%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSA vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUSA Brandes U.S. Value ETF	7.28%	17.56%	15.76%	10.92%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.07%	25.50%	20.10%	15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BUSA and CGDV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	0.76

The correlation between BUSA and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUSA vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUSA	CGDV
Healthcare	23.9%	10.4%
Financial Services	20.2%	6.6%
Technology	13.0%	33.1%
Industrials	12.9%	12.9%
Energy	7.3%	4.4%
Communication Services	5.6%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	11.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.8%
Utilities	3.4%	1.0%
Real Estate	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

BUSA vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSA

BUSA Risk / Return Rank: 54
BUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSA vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUSA	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.23	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	3.06	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.41	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.81	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	13.07	-3.96

BUSA vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUSA and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUSA vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSA and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUSA	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.19%	-21.82%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-9.75%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-1.79%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-3.59%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	2.09%	+0.16%

Volatility

BUSA vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) is 3.13%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that BUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUSA	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	4.64%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	9.92%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	12.28%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.63%	15.57%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.63%	15.57%	-1.94%

BUSA vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUSA vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

BUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUSA Brandes U.S. Value ETF	1.47%	1.53%	1.37%	0.22%	0.00%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUSA and CGDV in my portfolio?

BUSA and CGDV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUSA or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to BUSA (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUSA dropped -14.19% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, BUSA or CGDV?

On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 27.24% vs 20.49% for BUSA. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, BUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUSA or CGDV?

Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 27.24% return vs 20.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUSA or CGDV?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUSA or CGDV?

BUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between BUSA and CGDV?

They also come from different issuers: Brandes and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUSA and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.