PortfoliosLab logo
BUSA vs. SCHV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BUSA and SCHV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

BUSA vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BUSA:

10.36%

SCHV:

15.84%

Max Drawdown

BUSA:

-0.60%

SCHV:

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

BUSA:

-0.09%

SCHV:

-5.77%

Returns By Period


BUSA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHV

YTD

0.99%

1M

5.48%

6M

-3.61%

1Y

9.91%

5Y*

16.61%

10Y*

11.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUSA vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BUSA vs. SCHV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUSA is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUSA is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUSA is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUSA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUSA is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUSA is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHV is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHV is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHV is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHV is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHV is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHV is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BUSA vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

BUSA vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

BUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than SCHV's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%3.95%2.69%2.38%

Drawdowns

BUSA vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUSA drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSA and SCHV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BUSA vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...