BUSA vs. DHLX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX).

BUSA and DHLX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUSA is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023. DHLX is a passively managed fund by Diamond Hill that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Feb 26, 2021.

Performance

BUSA vs. DHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUSA vs. DHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUSA Brandes U.S. Value ETF	2.42%	5.99%
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF	-1.96%	1.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUSA achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than DHLX's -1.96% return.

BUSA

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 15.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DHLX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -1.96%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSA vs. DHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DHLX's 0.55% expense ratio.

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

DHLX

Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF

Return for Risk

BUSA vs. DHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSA

BUSA Risk / Return Rank: 45
BUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSA vs. DHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUSA	DHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUSA	DHLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	-0.13	+1.51

Correlation

The correlation between BUSA and DHLX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BUSA vs. DHLX - Dividend Comparison

BUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than DHLX's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BUSA Brandes U.S. Value ETF	1.54%	1.53%	1.37%	0.22%
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF	0.41%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BUSA vs. DHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, which is greater than DHLX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSA and DHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUSA	DHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.19%	-8.40%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-5.79%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-1.94%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUSA	DHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.36%	11.70%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	11.70%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	11.70%	+2.13%