PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUSA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUSA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUSA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
2.12%17.56%15.76%10.65%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
12.17%4.34%11.66%11.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUSA achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.17% return.


BUSA

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
2.12%
6M
7.18%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHD

1D
-0.55%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
12.17%
6M
12.91%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUSA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUSA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUSA
BUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUSASCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.88

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.05

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.85

3.55

+1.30

BUSA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUSA and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUSASCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.88

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.84

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BUSA and SCHD is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUSA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than SCHD's 3.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
1.55%1.53%1.37%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.46%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Drawdowns

BUSA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSA and SCHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUSASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-33.37%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-12.74%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-3.43%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-3.34%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.75%

-0.61%

Volatility

BUSA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.33%. This indicates that BUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUSASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

2.33%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

7.96%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

15.69%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

14.40%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

16.70%

-2.86%