PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BURL vs. LII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BURL vs. LII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BURL achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than LII's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BURL has outperformed LII with an annualized return of 18.05%, while LII has yielded a comparatively lower 15.46% annualized return.


BURL

1D
2.38%
1M
6.28%
YTD
13.80%
6M
32.09%
1Y
38.21%
3Y*
29.61%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
18.05%

LII

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.09%
YTD
6.43%
6M
3.63%
1Y
-7.15%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BURL vs. LII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
13.80%1.33%46.58%-4.08%-30.44%11.45%14.70%40.18%32.22%45.17%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
6.43%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%12.78%6.33%37.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BURL and LII is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BURL:

$21.08B

LII:

$18.04B

EPS

BURL:

$9.74

LII:

$22.20

PE Ratio

BURL:

33.74

LII:

23.21

PEG Ratio

BURL:

1.74

LII:

1.41

PS Ratio

BURL:

1.77

LII:

3.46

PB Ratio

BURL:

5.54

LII:

14.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

BURL:

$11.92B

LII:

$5.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BURL:

$5.24B

LII:

$1.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

BURL:

$1.33B

LII:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BURL vs. LII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BURL
BURL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BURL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BURL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BURL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BURL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BURL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BURL vs. LII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BURLLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.99

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

-0.21

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

-0.35

+5.26

BURL vs. LII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BURL Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the LII Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BURL and LII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BURLLIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

-0.21

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.31

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.53

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.43

+0.12

Drawdowns

BURL vs. LII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BURL drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than LII's maximum drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BURL and LII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BURLLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-62.76%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.55%

-33.77%

+14.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.38%

-34.71%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.87%

-46.88%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.87%

-46.88%

-21.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-22.94%

+16.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-14.50%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

20.59%

-12.80%

Volatility

BURL vs. LII - Volatility Comparison

Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Lennox International Inc. (LII) at 10.19%. This indicates that BURL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BURLLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.49%

10.19%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.87%

25.93%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.94%

34.81%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.11%

32.04%

+12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.76%

29.26%

+12.50%

Dividends

BURL vs. LII - Dividend Comparison

BURL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.01%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%

Financials

BURL vs. LII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Lennox International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
2.86B
1.14B
(BURL) Total Revenue
(LII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BURL vs. LII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Lennox International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
44.2%
31.0%
Portfolio components
BURL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

BURL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 142.67M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

BURL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 114.74M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BURL and LII have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BURL has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to LII (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BURL dropped -68.87% vs LII's -62.76%.

BURL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BURL and LII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer