BULZ vs. USD
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD).
BULZ and USD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. USD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. Both BULZ and USD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BULZ vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULZ vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | -28.68% | 60.09% | 54.09% | 394.22% | -92.26% | 12.62% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | -4.90% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 61.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a -28.68% return, which is significantly lower than USD's -4.90% return.
BULZ
- 1D
- 5.23%
- 1M
- -12.77%
- YTD
- -28.68%
- 6M
- -31.57%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- 59.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USD
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 145.25%
- 3Y*
- 90.90%
- 5Y*
- 44.58%
- 10Y*
- 50.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULZ vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BULZ and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
BULZ vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
BULZ
USD
BULZ vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULZ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.90 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 2.44 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 4.67 | -3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 12.81 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULZ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.90 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.41 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and USD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BULZ vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.48% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and USD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULZ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -88.63% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.22% | -31.80% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.52% | -21.24% | -25.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.15% | -32.60% | -27.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.25% | 11.60% | +8.65% |
Volatility
BULZ vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 29.26% compared to ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) at 21.67%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULZ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.26% | 21.67% | +7.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.63% | 48.73% | +11.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.48% | 77.08% | +15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.56% | 76.24% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.56% | 68.85% | +22.71% |