BULZ vs. FTAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation, while FTAI (Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BULZ returned 102.20%/yr vs 106.46%/yr for FTAI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BULZ vs. FTAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 100.89% return, which is significantly higher than FTAI's 25.91% return.

BULZ

• 1D: -3.69%
• 1M: 48.46%
• YTD: 100.89%
• 6M: 88.97%
• 1Y: 258.75%
• 3Y*: 102.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTAI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 25.91%
• 6M: 44.95%
• 1Y: 101.80%
• 3Y*: 106.46%
• 5Y*: 58.52%
• 10Y*: 45.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULZ vs. FTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	100.89%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	12.62%
FTAI Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC	25.91%	38.01%	214.72%	181.65%	-36.67%	7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BULZ and FTAI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021	0.41

Return for Risk

BULZ vs. FTAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 76
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FTAI

FTAI Risk / Return Rank: 82
FTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULZ vs. FTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BULZ	FTAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.51	1.62	+1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.56	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.31	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	3.29	+1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	8.19	+4.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BULZ vs. FTAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the FTAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULZ and FTAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BULZ	FTAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51	1.62	+1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.72	-0.53

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. FTAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than FTAI's maximum drawdown of -72.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and FTAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULZ	FTAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-72.79%	-21.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.22%	-31.15%	-23.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.96%	-52.11%	-15.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-54.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.35%	-20.06%	+14.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.42%	-17.36%	-41.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.19%	12.47%	+7.72%

Volatility

BULZ vs. FTAI - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) have volatilities of 22.49% and 23.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BULZ	FTAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.49%	23.43%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.86%	46.47%	+10.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.35%	63.12%	+11.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.23%	56.23%	+35.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.23%	51.04%	+40.19%

Dividends

BULZ vs. FTAI - Dividend Comparison

BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTAI Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC	0.61%	0.64%	0.83%	2.59%	7.54%	4.56%	5.63%	6.76%	9.21%	6.62%	9.92%	4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BULZ and FTAI in my portfolio?

BULZ and FTAI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BULZ or FTAI?

FTAI has higher volatility (23.43%) compared to BULZ (22.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULZ dropped -94.44% vs FTAI's -72.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.