BULD vs. COWG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).
BULD and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULD is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index. It was launched on May 4, 2022. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. Both BULD and COWG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BULD vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULD vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 5.95% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | 0.24% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -3.92% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -3.92% return.
BULD
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 39.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- 9.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULD vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
COWG
BULD vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULD | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.41 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 0.74 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 0.79 | +1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 2.55 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULD | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.41 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.93 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and COWG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BULD vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than COWG's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 1.17% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BULD vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and COWG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -23.60% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -12.96% | -2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -7.98% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -3.36% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 4.00% | +1.02% |
Volatility
BULD vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) at 5.87%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.27% | 5.87% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.23% | 13.24% | +8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.95% | 22.50% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 19.32% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 19.32% | +8.30% |