BUL vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. BUL is passively managed, while RSHO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUL returned 22.33%/yr vs 31.02%/yr for RSHO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.

Performance

BUL vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.

BUL

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.95%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 22.33%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 33.69%
• 6M: 33.85%
• 1Y: 57.71%
• 3Y*: 31.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUL vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	9.02%	19.18%	27.39%	11.12%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	33.69%	19.23%	17.28%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and RSHO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.78

The correlation between BUL and RSHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUL vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUL	RSHO
Technology	28.3%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	22.3%	3.7%
Healthcare	21.4%	-
Industrials	13.4%	73.1%
Basic Materials	5.7%	8.5%
Energy	5.1%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	-
Communication Services	1.6%	-
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BUL vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 50
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 59

RSHO

RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUL vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUL	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.44	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.28	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.40	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	3.96	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	15.16	-4.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUL vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUL	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.44	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.48	-0.89

Drawdowns

BUL vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than RSHO's maximum drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUL	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-27.31%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-14.64%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.55%	-27.31%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-4.32%	-3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	3.82%	-1.36%

Volatility

BUL vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is 5.32%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that BUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUL	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	9.22%	-3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	20.09%	-8.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	23.74%	-6.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	22.55%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.25%	22.55%	+1.70%

BUL vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUL vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than RSHO's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.23%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUL and RSHO in my portfolio?

BUL and RSHO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUL or RSHO?

RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to BUL (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

Which ETF is better, BUL or RSHO?

On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 31.02% vs 22.33% for BUL. On fees, BUL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUL has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUL or RSHO?

Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 31.02% return vs 22.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUL or RSHO?

BUL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUL or RSHO?

BUL and RSHO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.23%.

What is the main difference between BUL and RSHO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.75% for RSHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.