BUG vs. VOOG
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for VOOG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOG.
Performance
BUG vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 13.78% return.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
BUG vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.78% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and VOOG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BUG and VOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUG vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
VOOG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUG
VOOG
Communication Services
BUG
VOOG
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
VOOG
Consumer Defensive
BUG
VOOG
Healthcare
BUG
VOOG
Basic Materials
BUG
-
VOOG
Energy
BUG
-
VOOG
Financial Services
BUG
-
VOOG
Industrials
BUG
-
VOOG
Real Estate
BUG
-
VOOG
Utilities
BUG
-
VOOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
VOOG
BUG vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 2.49 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 10.32 | -10.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 2.16 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.76 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.91 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and VOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -32.73% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -13.71% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -22.18% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -32.73% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -1.08% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -4.97% | -9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 3.31% | +15.05% |
Volatility
BUG vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 4.32%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 4.32% | +9.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 12.41% | +13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 15.85% | +14.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 21.19% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 20.73% | +8.60% |
BUG vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VOOG's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and VOOG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to VOOG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs VOOG's -32.73%.
On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 16.03% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.07% for VOOG.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and VOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer