BUG vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BUG is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

BUG vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 16.13% return.

BUG

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: -6.48%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -3.32%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUG vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	11.69%	-8.85%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	16.13%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and TRUT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

BUG vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUG

BUG Risk / Return Rank: 7
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUG vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUG	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	—	—

Drawdowns

BUG vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUG	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-18.55%	-23.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.75%	-8.67%	-3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.38%	-5.27%	-9.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUG	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.21%	23.21%	+8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.55%	23.21%	+5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.30%	23.21%	+6.09%

BUG vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUG vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TRUT's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.09%	0.10%	1.56%	0.66%	0.46%	0.24%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUG and TRUT in my portfolio?

BUG and TRUT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUG or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUG or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUG or TRUT?

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.

What is the main difference between BUG and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.13% for TRUT.