BUG vs. TRUT
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BUG is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
BUG vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 25.30% return.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUG vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -8.33% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and TRUT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
TRUT
BUG vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 2.39 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -18.55% | -23.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -1.46% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -5.17% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | — | — |
Volatility
BUG vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 21.53% | +9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 21.53% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 21.53% | +7.80% |
BUG vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and TRUT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for BUG and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer