BUG vs. TIME
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BUG is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, BUG returned -6.48% vs 18.44% for TIME. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
BUG vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 6.28% return.
BUG
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- -6.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUG vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 11.69% | -5.04% | 14.14% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 6.28% | 10.17% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and TIME is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between BUG and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUG vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
TIME
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUG
TIME
Communication Services
BUG
TIME
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
TIME
Consumer Defensive
BUG
TIME
Healthcare
BUG
TIME
Basic Materials
BUG
-
TIME
Energy
BUG
-
TIME
Financial Services
BUG
-
TIME
Industrials
BUG
-
TIME
Real Estate
BUG
-
TIME
-
Utilities
BUG
-
TIME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
TIME
BUG vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUG | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.41 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 5.10 | -5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUG vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -24.26% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -13.09% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.75% | -3.94% | -7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -5.53% | -8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.53% | 3.63% | +14.90% |
Volatility
BUG vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 5.23%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 5.23% | +8.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.20% | 11.10% | +15.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.21% | 13.98% | +17.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.55% | 17.73% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 17.73% | +11.57% |
BUG vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TIME's 9.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.43% | 10.02% | 15.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and TIME have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to TIME (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 18.44% vs -6.48% for BUG. On fees, BUG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 18.44% return vs -6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.43%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 1.00% for TIME.
TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer