BUG vs. TAAGX
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both funds - BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while TAAGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Timothy Plan. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 8.31%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for TAAGX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.
Performance
BUG vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 37.85% return, which is significantly higher than TAAGX's 28.94% return.
BUG
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- 23.10%
- 6M
- 37.67%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TAAGX
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 21.14%
- YTD
- 28.94%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 29.57%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
BUG vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 37.85% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.21% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 28.94% | 16.01% | 36.81% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and TAAGX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and TAAGX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
TAAGX
BUG vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUG | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 4.97 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 16.62 | -15.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUG vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and TAAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -62.13% | +20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.16% | -9.26% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -29.24% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -34.47% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.22% | +9.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -18.63% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.11% | 2.76% | +13.35% |
Volatility
BUG vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) have volatilities of 10.69% and 10.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 10.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.91% | 19.55% | +8.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 23.65% | +8.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 23.89% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 22.46% | +7.02% |
BUG vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TAAGX's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.66% | 3.44% | 17.62% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to TAAGX (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.
TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and TAAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer