BUG vs. TAAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both funds - BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while TAAGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Timothy Plan. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 18.22%/yr for TAAGX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.

Performance

BUG vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 36.54% return.

BUG

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: 33.08%
• YTD: 20.72%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

TAAGX

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 36.54%
• 6M: 34.76%
• 1Y: 62.49%
• 3Y*: 35.37%
• 5Y*: 18.22%
• 10Y*: 16.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUG vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	20.72%	-5.04%	9.59%	41.40%	-33.63%	13.24%	70.83%	6.55%
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	36.54%	16.01%	36.81%	26.46%	-25.98%	17.90%	36.11%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and TAAGX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and TAAGX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BUG vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUG

BUG Risk / Return Rank: 10
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

TAAGX

TAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 90
TAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
TAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUG vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUG	TAAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	3.12	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	3.95	-3.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.51	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	7.07	-6.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	28.22	-28.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUG vs. TAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the TAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUG and TAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUG	TAAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	3.12	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.78	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.28	+0.21

Drawdowns

BUG vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and TAAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUG	TAAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-62.13%	+20.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.69%	-9.26%	-28.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.69%	-29.24%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.66%	-34.47%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	0.00%	-4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.42%	-18.69%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.36%	2.31%	+16.05%

Volatility

BUG vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) at 6.86%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUG	TAAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.07%	6.86%	+7.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.81%	16.92%	+8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.78%	20.98%	+9.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.47%	23.37%	+5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.33%	22.31%	+7.02%

BUG vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUG vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TAAGX's 2.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.09%	0.10%	1.56%	0.66%	0.46%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	2.52%	3.44%	17.62%	3.12%	3.06%	8.89%	5.75%	0.00%	7.57%	0.00%	0.00%	15.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUG and TAAGX in my portfolio?

BUG and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUG or TAAGX?

BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to TAAGX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.