BUG vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X - BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUG returned 15.82%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for KROP. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

BUG vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.34% return.

BUG

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: 33.08%
• YTD: 20.72%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 0.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUG vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	20.72%	-5.04%	9.59%	41.40%	-33.63%	9.33%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.34%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and KROP is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and KROP has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BUG vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUG	KROP
Technology	99.9%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	26.3%
Healthcare	0.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	32.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	39.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BUG vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUG

BUG Risk / Return Rank: 10
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 24
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUG vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUG	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	0.86	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	1.31	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.16	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	1.22	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	2.75	-2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUG vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUG and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUG	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	0.86	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	-0.57	+1.06

Drawdowns

BUG vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUG	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-61.96%	+20.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.69%	-11.29%	-26.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.69%	-28.70%	-8.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	-49.05%	+44.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.42%	-44.50%	+30.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.36%	4.99%	+13.37%

Volatility

BUG vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUG	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.07%	4.77%	+9.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.81%	12.01%	+13.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.78%	16.04%	+14.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.47%	22.28%	+6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.33%	22.28%	+7.05%

BUG vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BUG and KROP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

BUG vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than KROP's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.09%	0.10%	1.56%	0.66%	0.46%	0.24%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.35%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUG and KROP in my portfolio?

BUG and KROP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUG or KROP?

BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, BUG or KROP?

On 3-year performance, BUG leads with 15.82% vs 0.81% for KROP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUG or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, BUG has performed better with a 15.82% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUG or KROP?

BUG and KROP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUG or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.

What is the main difference between BUG and KROP?

BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.