BUG vs. COPX
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for COPX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
BUG vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
BUG vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and COPX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and COPX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BUG vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
COPX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
BUG
COPX
-
Communication Services
BUG
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
BUG
COPX
-
Healthcare
BUG
COPX
-
Basic Materials
BUG
-
COPX
Energy
BUG
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
BUG
-
COPX
-
Industrials
BUG
-
COPX
Real Estate
BUG
-
COPX
-
Utilities
BUG
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
COPX
BUG vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.42 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 4.37 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 14.00 | -13.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 2.93 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.55 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.19 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -83.16% | +41.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -27.82% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -39.72% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -42.12% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -5.69% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -39.30% | +24.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 8.66% | +9.70% |
Volatility
BUG vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) is 14.07%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that BUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 15.38% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 35.68% | -9.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 41.41% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 36.51% | -8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 35.55% | -6.22% |
BUG vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and COPX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to BUG (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.87% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, BUG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUG has been the lower-risk option at 14.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG is categorized as Technology Equities, while COPX is Materials. BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer