BUFZ vs. PBFB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFZ (FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF) and PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BUFZ returned 14.14% vs 13.63% for PBFB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFB.

Performance

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFZ achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than PBFB's 4.68% return.

BUFZ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.69%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBFB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	4.98%	11.05%	10.15%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	4.68%	9.86%	10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and PBFB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.87

The correlation between BUFZ and PBFB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. PBFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFZ	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.87	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	4.27	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.61	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	3.61	+0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.94	19.17	+2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the PBFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFZ and PBFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFZ	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.87	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	1.67	+0.29

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, which is greater than PBFB's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and PBFB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFZ	PBFB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-8.65%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.51%	-3.79%	+0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.15%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-0.60%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.71%	-0.06%

Volatility

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) have volatilities of 0.77% and 0.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFZ	PBFB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.75%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.02%	3.71%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	4.77%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.33%	6.39%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.33%	6.39%	+0.94%

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFZ vs. PBFB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFZ nor PBFB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFZ and PBFB in my portfolio?

BUFZ and PBFB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFZ or PBFB?

BUFZ has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to PBFB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFZ dropped -10.14% vs PBFB's -8.65%.

Which ETF is better, BUFZ or PBFB?

On 1-year performance, BUFZ leads with 14.14% vs 13.63% for PBFB. On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFZ or PBFB?

Over the 1-year period, BUFZ has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFZ or PBFB?

PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFZ or PBFB?

BUFZ and PBFB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFZ and PBFB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BUFZ and 0.50% for PBFB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.