PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.


BUFX

1D
0.02%
1M
1.06%
6M
5.37%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.26%

NVDO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
20.69%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$120.23K$111.05K$121.73K
$0.00$0.00$23.95K

BUFX vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and NVDO is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFX vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFXNVDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.62

BUFX vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-16.25%

+13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.73%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-4.94%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

Volatility

BUFX vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXNVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

30.10%

-26.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.96%

30.10%

-26.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.96%

30.10%

-26.14%

BUFX vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and NVDO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer