BUFX vs. MOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.

Performance

BUFX vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 10.10% return.

BUFX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 4.10%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -0.70%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	4.10%	5.62%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	10.10%	2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and MOO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

BUFX vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFX vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFX	MOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.68	0.22	+2.46

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFX	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-69.53%	+66.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-17.50%	+17.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-16.97%	+16.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUFX	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	13.88%	-9.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.98%	17.12%	-13.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.98%	18.19%	-14.21%

BUFX vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFX vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.24%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFX and MOO in my portfolio?

BUFX and MOO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUFX or MOO?

On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFX or MOO?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFX or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

What is the main difference between BUFX and MOO?

BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.55% for MOO.