BUFS vs. PMAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUFS (FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. BUFS is actively managed, while PMAR is passively managed. Over the past year, BUFS returned 19.47% vs 14.20% for PMAR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFS charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PMAR.

Performance

BUFS vs. PMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFS achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than PMAR's 5.76% return.

BUFS

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 19.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMAR

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFS vs. PMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFS FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	9.06%	7.08%	6.83%
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	5.76%	11.82%	8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFS and PMAR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024	0.75

The correlation between BUFS and PMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFS vs. PMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFS

BUFS Risk / Return Rank: 80
BUFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BUFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BUFS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BUFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BUFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PMAR

PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFS vs. PMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFS	PMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.68	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.96	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.59	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	3.47	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.74	20.17	-3.43

BUFS vs. PMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the PMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFS and PMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFS vs. PMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFS drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum PMAR drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFS and PMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFS	PMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-17.18%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.68%	-4.11%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.63%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-1.55%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.71%	+0.46%

Volatility

BUFS vs. PMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) at 1.69%. This indicates that BUFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFS	PMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	1.69%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.71%	4.41%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.03%	5.35%	+3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.16%	8.20%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.16%	10.71%	+0.45%

BUFS vs. PMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFS vs. PMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFS nor PMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFS and PMAR in my portfolio?

BUFS and PMAR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFS or PMAR?

BUFS has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to PMAR (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFS dropped -15.03% vs PMAR's -17.18%.

Which ETF is better, BUFS or PMAR?

On 1-year performance, BUFS leads with 19.47% vs 14.20% for PMAR. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFS or PMAR?

Over the 1-year period, BUFS has performed better with a 19.47% return vs 14.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFS or PMAR?

PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for BUFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFS or PMAR?

BUFS and PMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFS and PMAR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for BUFS and 0.79% for PMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.