BUFR vs. GRID
BUFR (FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. BUFR is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFR returned 9.98%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for GRID. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
BUFR vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.
BUFR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 17.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
BUFR vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 6.42% | 12.44% | 14.68% | 19.63% | -7.57% | 11.88% | 7.57% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 31.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFR and GRID is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between BUFR and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
BUFR vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUFR
GRID
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
BUFR
GRID
Financial Services
BUFR
GRID
-
Communication Services
BUFR
GRID
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUFR
GRID
Healthcare
BUFR
GRID
-
Industrials
BUFR
GRID
Consumer Defensive
BUFR
GRID
-
Energy
BUFR
GRID
-
Utilities
BUFR
GRID
Real Estate
BUFR
GRID
-
Basic Materials
BUFR
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFR vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
BUFR
GRID
BUFR vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFR | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.45 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 4.42 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | 16.72 | +4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFR | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.67 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.57 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
BUFR vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFR | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -40.56% | +26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -11.73% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -20.77% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.73% | -29.64% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -1.33% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -8.43% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 3.09% | -2.24% |
Volatility
BUFR vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 1.03%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFR | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 7.95% | -6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 16.08% | -11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.53% | 19.39% | -12.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 21.00% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 22.81% | -12.58% |
BUFR vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFR vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFR and GRID have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to BUFR (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.84% vs 9.98% for BUFR. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.
GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.
BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.70% for GRID.
BUFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFR and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer