PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFR vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
-1.43%12.44%14.68%19.63%-7.57%11.88%7.57%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
-0.90%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%5.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's -0.90% return.


BUFR

1D
1.90%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
-1.43%
6M
1.05%
1Y
13.74%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
1.46%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
1.13%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFR
BUFR Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BUFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFRBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.84

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.72

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.18

9.71

-0.53

BUFR vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFR and BUFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFRBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.92

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.46

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between BUFR and BUFF is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Drawdowns

BUFR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and BUFF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFRBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-46.23%

+32.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-7.15%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-10.24%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-2.18%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-6.29%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.27%

+0.29%

Volatility

BUFR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 2.61%. This indicates that BUFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFRBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.61%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.22%

4.05%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

9.82%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.46%

8.40%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.34%

17.83%

-7.49%