PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFMX vs. SMCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -2.34% return, which is significantly lower than SMCWX's 12.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed SMCWX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while SMCWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.


BUFMX

1D
-1.11%
1M
1.94%
YTD
-2.34%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
-6.39%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
8.24%

SMCWX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.38%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.27%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
-2.34%-1.68%6.73%26.92%-27.89%14.39%34.24%37.96%-7.29%13.59%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.27%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFMX and SMCWX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2001

0.87

The correlation between BUFMX and SMCWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFMX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFMX
BUFMX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BUFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFMXSMCWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.28

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

2.12

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

8.50

-9.18

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the SMCWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFMX and SMCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFMXSMCWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.59

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.11

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.21

Drawdowns

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, smaller than the maximum SMCWX drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and SMCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFMXSMCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-62.46%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.37%

-11.83%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-21.40%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.58%

-39.79%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-39.79%

+4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-0.95%

-9.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-14.91%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

2.95%

+5.47%

Volatility

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) is 3.92%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that BUFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFMXSMCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.11%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.81%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

15.82%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

18.19%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

17.89%

+1.82%

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BUFMX and SMCWX have an expense ratio of 1.02%.


Dividends

BUFMX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison

BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than SMCWX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
10.55%10.31%6.93%5.21%5.46%11.45%6.91%8.20%4.47%25.22%8.49%13.06%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.32%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFMX and SMCWX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to BUFMX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs SMCWX's -62.46%.

SMCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFMX and SMCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer