PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and TDIV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFH

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFH vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.88

+2.03

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-31.97%

+30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.79%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-4.84%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

Volatility

BUFH vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

18.47%

-16.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

20.67%

-18.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

20.85%

-18.48%

BUFH vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and TDIV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.50% for TDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer