BUFH vs. TDIV
BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
BUFH vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return.
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 30.57%
- 6M
- 28.79%
- 1Y
- 53.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
BUFH vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 30.57% | 10.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFH and TDIV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFH vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
BUFH
TDIV
BUFH vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFH | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.91 | 0.88 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
BUFH vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFH | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -31.97% | +30.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.79% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -4.84% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.44% | — |
Volatility
BUFH vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFH | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 18.47% | -16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.37% | 20.67% | -18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.37% | 20.85% | -18.48% |
BUFH vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFH vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFH and TDIV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for BUFH and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer