BUFH vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

BUFH vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 5.32% return.

BUFH

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	1.34%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	5.32%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and JANB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

BUFH vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFH	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-6.52%	+4.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.97%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-1.10%	+0.92%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUFH	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	7.51%	-5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	7.51%	-5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	7.51%	-5.13%

BUFH vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFH vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFH nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFH and JANB in my portfolio?

BUFH and JANB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUFH or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFH or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFH or JANB?

BUFH and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFH and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.25% for JANB.