PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. IYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. IYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF (IYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than IYY's 10.92% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IYY

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.83%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. IYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%3.89%
IYY
iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF
10.92%12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and IYY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. IYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFH

IYY
IYY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFH vs. IYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF (IYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. IYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHIYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.44

+2.47

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. IYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum IYY drawdown of -55.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and IYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHIYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-55.17%

+53.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.73%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-10.84%

+10.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

BUFH vs. IYY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHIYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

12.01%

-9.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

17.12%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

18.16%

-15.79%

BUFH vs. IYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IYY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. IYY - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYY
iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF
0.87%0.95%1.05%1.29%1.48%1.04%1.31%1.80%1.97%1.62%1.81%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and IYY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IYY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IYY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

IYY has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IYY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.20% for IYY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and IYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer