PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. ACEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.04% return, which is significantly higher than ACEP's 24.34% return.


AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACEP

1D
-0.69%
1M
8.05%
YTD
24.34%
6M
27.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and ACEP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. ACEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSACEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

4.41

-0.06

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and ACEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSACEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-7.06%

-4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.69%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-1.41%

+0.04%

Volatility

AFOS vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSACEPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

17.29%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

17.29%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

17.29%

+2.90%

AFOS vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AFOS and ACEP have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

AFOS vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AFOS and ACEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS and ACEP have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and ACEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer