BUFDX vs. GTLOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFDX (Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund) and GTLOX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BUFDX returned 12.80%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for GTLOX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFDX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GTLOX.

Performance

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFDX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUFDX having a 12.80% annualized return and GTLOX not far behind at 12.70%.

BUFDX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 7.73%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 16.77%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

GTLOX

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 9.29%
• YTD: 22.45%
• 6M: 24.47%
• 1Y: 42.05%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BUFDX Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund	7.73%	8.39%	20.13%	20.07%	-8.77%	20.95%	16.62%	27.67%	-5.06%	17.64%
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	22.45%	14.39%	13.86%	16.66%	-15.37%	27.05%	7.41%	23.27%	-7.97%	24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFDX and GTLOX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.92

The correlation between BUFDX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BUFDX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFDX

BUFDX Risk / Return Rank: 38
BUFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BUFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BUFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BUFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BUFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

GTLOX

GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFDX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	3.17	-1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	4.30	-1.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.55	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	5.88	-3.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.90	25.30	-15.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFDX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFDX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	3.17	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.52	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.61	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.50	+0.38

Drawdowns

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFDX drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFDX and GTLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFDX	GTLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.11%	-54.09%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.66%	-7.47%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.71%	-32.85%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	-32.85%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.11%	-38.15%	+5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.14%	-8.33%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	1.73%	+0.03%

Volatility

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) is 1.72%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that BUFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFDX	GTLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	4.25%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	10.36%	-2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	13.88%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.21%	21.86%	-7.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.89%	20.91%	-5.02%

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFDX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFDX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

BUFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than GTLOX's 14.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFDX Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund	1.47%	1.23%	1.26%	1.95%	2.61%	1.72%	0.46%	1.09%	5.20%	1.76%	0.96%	3.23%
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	14.62%	17.84%	25.96%	8.32%	23.58%	13.35%	9.06%	5.35%	10.53%	4.99%	1.08%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFDX and GTLOX in my portfolio?

BUFDX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFDX or GTLOX?

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to BUFDX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFDX dropped -33.11% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.