PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFDX vs. BUFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFDX achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than BUFGX's -3.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUFDX having a 12.65% annualized return and BUFGX not far behind at 12.44%.


BUFDX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.21%
6M
7.33%
YTD
9.96%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.65%
ALL TIME*
12.96%

BUFGX

1D
2.51%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
-3.07%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFDX
Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund
9.96%8.39%20.13%20.07%-8.77%20.95%16.62%27.67%-5.06%17.64%
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
-3.07%13.95%25.13%42.67%-31.19%21.52%28.29%31.89%0.69%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFDX and BUFGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between BUFDX and BUFGX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFDX vs. BUFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFDX
BUFDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BUFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFGX
BUFGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BUFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFDXBUFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.04

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.14

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

0.44

+8.03

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BUFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFDX and BUFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFDX drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum BUFGX drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFDX and BUFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFDXBUFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-50.17%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-17.63%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-21.93%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-35.68%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

-35.68%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-5.94%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-8.95%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

5.63%

-3.83%

Volatility

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) is 2.65%, while Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that BUFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFDXBUFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.78%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

13.23%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

16.47%

-5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

21.57%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

20.78%

-4.91%

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFDX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFGX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFDX vs. BUFGX - Dividend Comparison

BUFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than BUFGX's 6.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFDX
Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund
1.43%1.23%1.26%1.95%2.61%1.72%0.46%1.09%5.20%1.76%0.96%3.23%
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
6.31%6.12%8.55%5.55%4.77%9.90%4.97%13.60%34.64%20.49%0.00%18.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFDX and BUFGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFGX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to BUFDX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFDX dropped -33.11% vs BUFGX's -50.17%.

BUFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFDX and BUFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer