BUD vs. BABA
BUD (Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. BUD operates in Beverages - Brewers (Consumer Defensive), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BUD returned -1.70%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUD vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUD achieves a 31.39% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BUD has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -1.70%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.42% annualized return.
BUD
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 31.39%
- 6M
- 32.01%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- -1.70%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
BUD vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 31.39% | 30.33% | -21.37% | 9.04% | 0.09% | -12.66% | -13.97% | 27.69% | -38.79% | 9.62% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUD and BABA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUD and BABA has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BUD:
$163.97B
BABA:
$272.45B
BUD:
$6.15
BABA:
CN¥33.90
BUD:
13.48
BABA:
22.55
BUD:
1.19
BABA:
1.01
BUD:
1.37
BABA:
2.26
BUD:
1.88
BABA:
1.75
BUD:
$120.38B
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
BUD:
$67.02B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
BUD:
$35.48B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUD vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
BUD
BABA
BUD vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.06 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | -0.12 | +1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUD vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUD drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUD and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.02% | -80.09% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.12% | -39.94% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.55% | -39.94% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -72.48% | +30.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.02% | -80.09% | +10.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.81% | -62.20% | +39.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -37.56% | +14.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.86% | 19.58% | -8.72% |
Volatility
BUD vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is 6.20%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that BUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 10.07% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 29.24% | -11.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.38% | 43.83% | -17.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 51.40% | -26.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.65% | 43.40% | -15.75% |
Dividends
BUD vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
BUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than BABA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 0.88% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 2.45% | 5.15% | 3.63% | 5.41% | 3.21% |
Financials
BUD vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BUD vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
BUD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
BUD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
BUD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUD and BABA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to BUD (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUD dropped -70.02% vs BABA's -80.09%.
BUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUD and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer