PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUD vs. ABEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BUD vs. ABEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) and Ambev S.A. (ABEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BUD having a 28.09% return and ABEV slightly lower at 27.13%. Over the past 10 years, BUD has underperformed ABEV with an annualized return of -1.97%, while ABEV has yielded a comparatively higher -1.25% annualized return.


BUD

1D
0.11%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
28.09%
6M
29.40%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
-1.97%

ABEV

1D
0.64%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
27.13%
6M
36.52%
1Y
40.23%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
-1.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUD vs. ABEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
28.09%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
27.13%45.11%-30.10%8.41%2.38%-4.39%-32.61%21.92%-37.29%35.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BUD and ABEV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.44

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BUD:

$159.86B

ABEV:

$49.22B

EPS

BUD:

$6.15

ABEV:

R$0.99

PE Ratio

BUD:

13.14

ABEV:

16.28

PEG Ratio

BUD:

1.16

ABEV:

3.07

PS Ratio

BUD:

1.33

ABEV:

2.88

PB Ratio

BUD:

1.83

ABEV:

2.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

BUD:

$120.38B

ABEV:

R$88.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BUD:

$67.02B

ABEV:

R$45.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BUD:

$35.48B

ABEV:

R$28.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUD vs. ABEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEV
ABEV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ABEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUD vs. ABEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) and Ambev S.A. (ABEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUDABEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.51

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

5.57

-4.11

BUD vs. ABEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUD Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the ABEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUD and ABEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUD vs. ABEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUD drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, smaller than the maximum ABEV drawdown of -74.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUD and ABEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUDABEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.02%

-74.04%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.12%

-16.10%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.55%

-38.37%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.93%

-40.63%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.02%

-72.26%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.74%

-42.50%

+17.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-31.85%

+8.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.70%

7.25%

+3.45%

Volatility

BUD vs. ABEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is 6.75%, while Ambev S.A. (ABEV) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that BUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUDABEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

7.54%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

25.19%

-7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

31.75%

-5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.89%

30.31%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

34.30%

-6.65%

Dividends

BUD vs. ABEV - Dividend Comparison

BUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than ABEV's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
4.97%8.10%6.10%5.26%5.36%4.38%2.67%2.51%3.79%2.57%3.41%4.32%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.66%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%

Financials

BUD vs. ABEV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Ambev S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
30.61B
22.46B
(BUD) Total Revenue
(ABEV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BUD values in USD, ABEV values in BRL

BUD vs. ABEV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Ambev S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%56.0%58.0%202120222023202420252026
55.9%
51.6%
Portfolio components
BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

ABEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.58B and revenue of 22.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

ABEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported an operating income of 5.87B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

ABEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUD and ABEV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABEV has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to BUD (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUD dropped -70.02% vs ABEV's -74.04%.

ABEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUD and ABEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer