PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUCK vs. SCHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
1.15%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.39%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.10%5.50%-6.44%3.43%3.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.10% return.


BUCK

1D
0.17%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.15%
6M
2.45%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHQ

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.76%
1Y
-0.34%
3Y*
-1.57%
5Y*
-4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUCK vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUCK vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHQ
SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUCKSCHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

-0.03

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

0.03

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.00

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.04

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.39

0.10

+1.30

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUCK and SCHQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUCKSCHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

-0.03

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

-0.25

+1.71

Correlation

The correlation between BUCK and SCHQ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than SCHQ's 4.73% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
7.56%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.73%4.54%4.58%3.79%2.88%1.69%1.51%0.44%

Drawdowns

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and SCHQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUCKSCHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-46.13%

+40.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-8.46%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-36.61%

+36.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-26.08%

+25.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

3.88%

-1.84%

Volatility

BUCK vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) is 0.37%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that BUCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUCKSCHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

3.46%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

5.99%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83%

10.36%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.55%

14.55%

-11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.55%

15.48%

-11.93%