PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BU vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF (BU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BU achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.


BU

1D
4.46%
1M
18.42%
YTD
-16.84%
6M
-7.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-1.95%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-56.09%
6M
-50.25%
1Y
-60.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BU and CRMG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BU

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF (BU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BU vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.65

+0.81

Drawdowns

BU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BU drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BU and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.98%

-74.38%

+20.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.65%

-67.87%

+25.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-37.81%

+12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.08%

Volatility

BU vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.40%

75.31%

+22.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.40%

75.62%

+21.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.40%

75.62%

+21.78%

BU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BU nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BU.

BU and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BU and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BU and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer