BU vs. COTG
BU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BU charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
BU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BU achieves a -20.39% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
BU
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- 15.42%
- YTD
- -20.39%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF | -20.39% | 29.45% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BU and COTG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF (BU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.28 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
BU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BU drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.98% | -25.69% | -28.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.10% | -23.48% | -21.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.32% | -8.35% | -16.97% |
Volatility
BU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.59% | 40.65% | +56.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.59% | 40.65% | +56.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.59% | 40.65% | +56.94% |
BU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BU and COTG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BU.
BU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for BU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer