BTRN vs. OOSP
BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTRN is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. BTRN is passively managed, while OOSP is actively managed. Over the past year, BTRN returned -17.28% vs 6.66% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.
Performance
BTRN vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.41% return.
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOSP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | 4.89% | 1.36% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 2.41% | 7.41% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTRN and OOSP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTRN vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank
BTRN
OOSP
BTRN vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTRN | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.37 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 5.09 | -5.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 18.85 | -20.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTRN | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | 1.80 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 2.28 | -2.28 |
Drawdowns
BTRN vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and OOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTRN | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -1.31% | -35.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -1.31% | -23.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.22% | -0.18% | -25.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.43% | -0.20% | -14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.76% | 0.35% | +14.41% |
Volatility
BTRN vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.17%. This indicates that BTRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTRN | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 1.17% | +5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 2.23% | +8.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 3.71% | +16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 3.35% | +27.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 3.35% | +27.59% |
BTRN vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTRN vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison
BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%, more than OOSP's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 6.47% | 6.71% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTRN and OOSP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTRN has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to OOSP (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTRN dropped -36.97% vs OOSP's -1.31%.
On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.66% vs -17.28% for BTRN. On fees, OOSP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.66% return vs -17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOSP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 6.47% for OOSP.
BTRN is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTRN and OOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer