PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTRN vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTRN vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTRN vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
-1.59%4.89%5.22%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
-10.68%27.05%12.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than IBLC's -10.68% return.


BTRN

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
-1.59%
6M
-10.23%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
6.56%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-10.68%
6M
-29.99%
1Y
57.18%
3Y*
34.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTRN vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BTRN vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTRN
BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTRN vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTRNIBLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.99

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.39

1.62

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.18

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.25

2.64

-2.39

BTRN vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTRN and IBLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTRNIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.99

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.23

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and IBLC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BTRN vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.20%, more than IBLC's 7.06% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
28.20%27.76%2.56%0.00%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
7.06%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and IBLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTRNIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-62.54%

+25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-44.94%

+25.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.95%

-41.28%

+22.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-26.00%

+11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.73%

20.15%

-7.42%

Volatility

BTRN vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is 2.69%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that BTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTRNIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

18.51%

-15.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

44.23%

-34.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

58.34%

-38.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

65.16%

-33.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.67%

65.16%

-33.49%