PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTR vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BTR
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
2.37%-2.15%14.45%-6.65%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-3.29%17.10%23.81%16.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTR achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's -3.29% return.


BTR

1D
0.30%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
2.37%
6M
3.49%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BTR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTR
BTR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTRVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.98

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.52

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.54

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.19

7.30

-7.12

BTR vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTR and VTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTRVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.98

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.48

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BTR and VTI is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BTR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than VTI's 1.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTR
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
1.26%1.29%0.87%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.17%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Drawdowns

BTR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTR drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTR and VTI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTRVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-55.45%

+38.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-12.30%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-5.54%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-8.08%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

2.60%

+3.76%

Volatility

BTR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) is 4.02%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that BTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTRVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.48%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

9.75%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

19.02%

-6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

17.41%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.01%

18.29%

-7.28%