BTR vs. CPII

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) and CPII (American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon, while CPII is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by American Beacon. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTR returned 4.17%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for CPII. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BTR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CPII.

Performance

BTR vs. CPII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTR achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than CPII's 2.87% return.

BTR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 5.82%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 1Y: 17.44%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.20%

CPII

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: 4.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	$78.21K	$71.52K	$93.67K
CPII American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	$7.03K	$4.83K	$26.18K

BTR vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	9.64%	-2.15%	14.45%	-6.78%
CPII American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	2.87%	2.76%	6.05%	1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BTR and CPII is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	-0.17

The correlation between BTR and CPII shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BTR vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTR

BTR Risk / Return Rank: 74
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CPII

CPII Risk / Return Rank: 36
CPII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CPII Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CPII Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CPII Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CPII Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTR vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTR	CPII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.89	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.29	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.17	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.38	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	3.32	+6.85

BTR vs. CPII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CPII Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTR and CPII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTR vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTR drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than CPII's maximum drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTR and CPII.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTR	CPII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-6.40%	-10.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-2.13%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.67%	-4.39%	-12.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-1.74%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-1.61%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	0.88%	+0.72%

Volatility

BTR vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison

Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) at 0.95%. This indicates that BTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTR	CPII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	0.95%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.15%	2.95%	+4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.86%	3.34%	+6.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.80%	5.84%	+4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.80%	5.84%	+4.96%

BTR vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTR vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison

BTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than CPII's 4.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	1.17%	1.29%	0.87%	0.91%	0.00%
CPII American Beacon Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	4.65%	4.20%	5.47%	5.86%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTR and CPII in my portfolio?

BTR and CPII have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTR or CPII?

BTR has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to CPII (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTR dropped -16.67% vs CPII's -6.40%.

Which ETF is better, BTR or CPII?

On 3-year performance, BTR leads with 4.17% vs 4.03% for CPII. On fees, CPII is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, CPII has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTR or CPII?

Over the 3-year period, BTR has performed better with a 4.17% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTR or CPII?

CPII is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTR or CPII?

CPII has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.17% for BTR.

What is the main difference between BTR and CPII?

BTR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CPII is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BTR and 0.74% for CPII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.