BTOT vs. CPAG
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - BTOT tracks the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index while CPAG tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for CPAG.
Performance
BTOT vs. CPAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than CPAG's -0.78% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CPAG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.83K | $48.31K | $75.14K | |
| $700.59K | $561.35K | $424.39K |
BTOT vs. CPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | -0.09% | 0.12% |
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.78% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and CPAG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. CPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. CPAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum CPAG drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and CPAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -2.78% | +0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.43% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -0.90% | +0.04% |
Volatility
BTOT vs. CPAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 3.70% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 3.70% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 3.70% | -0.08% |
BTOT vs. CPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CPAG's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTOT vs. CPAG - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.93% | 0.22% |
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BTOT and CPAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.31% for CPAG.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and CPAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer