PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTOT vs. CPAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTOT vs. CPAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than CPAG's -0.02% return.


BTOT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.39%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPAG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. CPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and CPAG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTOT vs. CPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTOT vs. CPAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTOTCPAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.75

-0.34

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. CPAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum CPAG drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and CPAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTOTCPAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-2.78%

+0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.68%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.74%

-0.03%

Volatility

BTOT vs. CPAG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTOTCPAGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

3.67%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

3.67%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

3.67%

+0.03%

BTOT vs. CPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CPAG's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTOT vs. CPAG - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BTOT and CPAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.

BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.

BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.31% for CPAG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTOT and CPAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer