BTOT vs. AMUB
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.
Performance
BTOT vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than AMUB's 22.57% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMUB
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.19K | $8.67K | $19.34K | |
| $31.83K | $48.31K | $75.14K |
BTOT vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | -0.09% | 0.12% |
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 22.57% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and AMUB is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMUB
BTOT vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTOT | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and AMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -79.46% | +77.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.66% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -28.86% | +28.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.36% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. AMUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 14.37% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 19.86% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 27.19% | -23.57% |
BTOT vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTOT vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while AMUB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.93% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTOT and AMUB have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.
BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for AMUB.
BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while AMUB is MLPs. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.80% for AMUB.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and AMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer