BTOT vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

BTOT vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.

BTOT

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF	0.39%	0.31%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and ACWI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

BTOT vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTOT vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTOT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.43	-0.02

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTOT	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-56.00%	+53.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.83%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-8.61%	+7.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTOT	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	12.78%	-9.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	16.05%	-12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.70%	17.11%	-13.41%

BTOT vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTOT vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF	2.13%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTOT and ACWI in my portfolio?

BTOT and ACWI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTOT or ACWI?

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTOT or ACWI?

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTOT or ACWI?

BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between BTOT and ACWI?

BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while ACWI is Global Equities. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.32% for ACWI.