BTO vs. FSRBX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX).
BTO is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Aug 18, 1994. FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
BTO vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTO vs. FSRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 4.20% | 5.85% | 28.92% | -1.16% | -23.58% | 61.86% | -8.97% | 38.87% | -25.68% | 13.12% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -4.77% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTO achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSRBX's -4.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BTO having a 10.87% annualized return and FSRBX not far behind at 10.57%.
BTO
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
FSRBX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTO vs. FSRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTO has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRBX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTO vs. FSRBX — Risk / Return Rank
BTO
FSRBX
BTO vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTO | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 0.74 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.56 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 1.46 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTO | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.27 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.36 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.42 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTO and FSRBX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BTO vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison
BTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than FSRBX's 1.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 7.25% | 7.41% | 7.28% | 8.64% | 7.51% | 4.72% | 7.25% | 6.06% | 5.94% | 3.76% | 5.10% | 4.75% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.55% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
Drawdowns
BTO vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTO drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum FSRBX drawdown of -76.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTO and FSRBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTO | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -76.89% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.79% | -15.60% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.80% | -41.95% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.70% | -51.23% | -14.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.00% | -14.30% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -13.30% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 6.00% | +0.45% |
Volatility
BTO vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) at 4.78%. This indicates that BTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTO | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 4.78% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 18.15% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 27.49% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.47% | 26.90% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.21% | 29.52% | +6.69% |