BTGD vs. VGLT
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while VGLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. BTGD is actively managed, while VGLT is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -31.91% vs 4.15% for VGLT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
BTGD vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -32.80% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's -1.16% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- -0.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.66%
- 10Y*
- -1.28%
BTGD vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -1.16% | 5.35% | -6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and VGLT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
VGLT
BTGD vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.60 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 1.53 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.48 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, which is greater than VGLT's maximum drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -46.18% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.31% | -7.01% | -46.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.77% | -37.30% | -13.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -15.08% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.72% | 2.72% | +22.00% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 14.85% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.50%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.85% | 2.50% | +12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.45% | 5.96% | +40.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.04% | 8.71% | +47.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.94% | 14.57% | +41.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.94% | 13.82% | +42.12% |
BTGD vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than VGLT's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.64% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and VGLT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -53.31% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
On 1-year performance, VGLT leads with 4.15% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGLT has performed better with a 4.15% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.64% for VGLT.
BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while VGLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.03% for VGLT.
VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer