BTGD vs. FBTC
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTGD is actively managed, while FBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs -38.65% for FBTC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.
Performance
BTGD vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC's -25.34% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -31.64%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.78%
- 1Y
- -38.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTGD vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -28.65% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -25.34% | -6.56% | 37.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and FBTC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BTGD and FBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
FBTC
BTGD vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.86 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.79 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.36 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | -0.89 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.30 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and FBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -49.33% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -49.33% | +1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.73% | -48.00% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -16.01% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | 28.41% | -4.32% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 9.39%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 9.39% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.64% | 34.38% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 43.61% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 50.13% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 50.13% | +5.38% |
BTGD vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 4.71% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and FBTC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to FBTC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs FBTC's -49.33%.
On 1-year performance, BTGD leads with -30.17% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTGD has performed better with a -30.17% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.25% for FBTC.
BTGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer